Theft under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)

Theft under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)


Theft, a common criminal offense, is a breach of property rights. It is defined and penalized under Section 378 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 and Section 303 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023. Though the BNS modernizes the legal framework, the essence of theft remains consistent, focusing on the unlawful and dishonest taking of another’s property.

Definition of Theft

Indian Penal Code (Section 378)

"Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent, moves that property in order to such taking, is said to commit theft."

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (Section 303)

Anyone intends to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person's consent is Theft Under Section 303 of BNS of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,

  • Whoever, intending to dishonestly take any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person's consent, moves that property in order to such taking, is said to commit theft.
  • Explanation 1: A thing so long as it is attached to the earth, not being movable property, is not the subject of theft; but it becomes capable of being the subject of theft as soon as it is severed from the earth.
  • Explanation 2: A move affected by the same act which affects the severance may be a theft.
  • Explanation 3: A person is said to cause a thing to move by removing an obstacle which prevents it from moving or by separating it from any other thing, as well as by actually moving it.
  • Explanation: A person, who by any means causes an animal to move, is said to move that animal, and to move everything which, in consequence of the motion so caused, is moved by that animal.
  • Explanation 5: The consent mentioned in this section may be express or implied, and may be given either by the person in possession, or by any person having for that purpose authority either express or implied.

Essential Ingredients of Theft

To constitute theft, the following elements must be established:

  • Movable Property: The subject of theft must be a tangible object capable of being moved from one place to another.
  • Possession of Another: The property must belong to someone other than the accused.
  • Dishonest Intention: The act must be done with an intent to cause wrongful gain or loss.
  • Without Consent: The removal of property must occur without the owner's express or implied consent.
  • Movement of Property: Actual physical movement of the property is essential to complete the offense.

Illustrations of Theft

  • A cuts down a tree on Z's ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of Z's possession without Z's consent. Here, as soon as A has severed the tree in order to such taking, he has committed theft.
  • A puts bait for dogs in his pocket, and thus induces Z's dog to follow it. Here, if A's intention is dishonestly to take the dog out of Z's possession without Z's consent. A has committed theft as soon as Z's dog has begun to follow A.
  • A meets a bullock carrying a box of treasure. He drives the bullock in a certain direction, in order that he may dishonestly take the treasure. As soon as the bullock begins to move, A has committed theft of the treasure.

Case Laws on Theft

K.N. Mehra v. State of Rajasthan (1957 AIR 369)

  • The accused flew a plane without authorization, claiming he intended to return it. The court held that the act amounted to theft as the accused acted dishonestly without the owner's consent.

Pyare Lal Bhargawa v State of Rajasthan, 1963

  • This case presented a nuanced interpretation of the offence of theft, particularly in instances of temporary deprivation or dispossession. In this case, the accused, a superintendent in a government office, unlawfully obtained a file from the secretariat and temporarily removed it from the department's possession. 
  • The court held that even temporary dispossession or deprivation suffices to meet the threshold of theft. In the case at hand, although the accused intended to return the file after its temporary removal, his actions resulted in the deprivation of the department's possession over the file, causing wrongful loss. 

Punishment for Theft

  • Under IPC (Section 379): The punishment for theft in India is imprisonment up to three years, a fine, or both. The punishment for a second or subsequent offense is imprisonment up to five years and a fine.
  • Under BNS (Section 303(2): The offender may face imprisonment for a term that may extend up to three years or fine, or both imprisonment and fine can be imposed.

Analysis

Theft laws in both IPC and BNS uphold the sanctity of ownership and possession. The transition to the BNS reflects the evolving legal landscape, addressing modern challenges while simplifying the language for better comprehension.

Theft cases often hinge on proving dishonest intention and lack of consent, making circumstantial evidence and witness testimony crucial. For students and legal practitioners, understanding the nuances through case laws and illustrations is essential to applying the law effectively.

NEW – IPC / CRPC / Evidence BARE ACT: https://amzn.to/4f7hAeX


Previous Post Next Post

Contact Form